Saturday, January 11, 2020

Gen 38:1-30


    • While Tamar would seem to be the heroine, her actions were not commendable
      • Her veil would have identified her as engaged, even as a prostitute
    • In the culture, adultery was considered wrong, but prostitution was accepted
    • Chapter shows how God uses talionic justice (i.e., reaping the same kind of punishment as the sin that they sow) in his discipline

    Genesis 38:1–11 (ESV) —
    1 It happened at that time that Judah went down from his brothers and turned aside to a certain Adullamite, whose name was Hirah. 2 There Judah saw the daughter of a certain Canaanite whose name was Shua. He took her and went in to her, 3 and she conceived and bore a son, and he called his name Er. 4 She conceived again and bore a son, and she called his name Onan. 5 Yet again she bore a son, and she called his name Shelah. Judah was in Chezib when she bore him.
    6 And Judah took a wife for Er his firstborn, and her name was Tamar. 7 But Er, Judah’s firstborn, was wicked in the sight of the Lord, and the Lord put him to death. 8 Then Judah said to Onan, “Go in to your brother’s wife and perform the duty of a brother-in-law to her, and raise up offspring for your brother.” 9 But Onan knew that the offspring would not be his. So whenever he went in to his brother’s wife he would waste the semen on the ground, so as not to give offspring to his brother. 10 And what he did was wicked in the sight of the Lord, and he put him to death also. 11 Then Judah said to Tamar his daughter-in-law, “Remain a widow in your father’s house, till Shelah my son grows up”—for he feared that he would die, like his brothers. So Tamar went and remained in her father’s house.

    • In this case, the passage does give us some clue to the time period. It does not mean right afterwards, it just says "at that time"
      • Judah marries a Canaanite woman (never names her) and has three sons: Er, Onan, and Shelah
      • Part of the reason for the story is that it emphasizes the impact of the Canaanites on the people of Israel
      • God needed to get them out of the land
        • Er is wicked
        • Onan is wicked
        • Judah's actions are also sinful
    • Common custom in the Near East and many other areas. The Mosaic Law did not abolish it but restrict it in Israel. NOTE: The law appears almost 500 years from this event
      • Deuteronomy 25:5–10 (ESV) — 5 “If brothers dwell together, and one of them dies and has no son, the wife of the dead man shall not be married outside the family to a stranger. Her husband’s brother shall go in to her and take her as his wife and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her. 6 And the first son whom she bears shall succeed to the name of his dead brother, that his name may not be blotted out of Israel. 7 And if the man does not wish to take his brother’s wife, then his brother’s wife shall go up to the gate to the elders and say, ‘My husband’s brother refuses to perpetuate his brother’s name in Israel; he will not perform the duty of a husband’s brother to me.’ 8 Then the elders of his city shall call him and speak to him, and if he persists, saying, ‘I do not wish to take her,’ 9 then his brother’s wife shall go up to him in the presence of the elders and pull his sandal off his foot and spit in his face. And she shall answer and say, ‘So shall it be done to the man who does not build up his brother’s house.’ 10 And the name of his house shall be called in Israel, ‘The house of him who had his sandal pulled off.’
      • This is similar to the idea of the kinsman redeemer, but apparently the legal implications grew quite a bit over the years and the practices changed by the time of Ruth
      • Interesting point at that time, is that among Assyrian and Hittite people, the levirate responsibility could pass to the father of the widow's husband if there were no brothers to fulfill it
    • What about Onan's actions?
      • One thing that apparently isn't clear is how much Onan's actions were selfish
      • Also, Onan's actions were frustrating the purpose of God for the line of Messiah
      • One commentator thought that Onan used the law for sexual gratification (Bible Knowledge Commentary, Ross)
    • Additionally, what do we see in Judah's actions? They are also deceitful and somewhat uncaring

    Genesis 38:12–19 (ESV) — 12 In the course of time the wife of Judah, Shua’s daughter, died. When Judah was comforted, he went up to Timnah to his sheepshearers, he and his friend Hirah the Adullamite. 13 And when Tamar was told, “Your father-in-law is going up to Timnah to shear his sheep,” 14 she took off her widow’s garments and covered herself with a veil, wrapping herself up, and sat at the entrance to Enaim, which is on the road to Timnah. For she saw that Shelah was grown up, and she had not been given to him in marriage. 15 When Judah saw her, he thought she was a prostitute, for she had covered her face. 16 He turned to her at the roadside and said, “Come, let me come in to you,” for he did not know that she was his daughter-in-law. She said, “What will you give me, that you may come in to me?” 17 He answered, “I will send you a young goat from the flock.” And she said, “If you give me a pledge, until you send it—” 18 He said, “What pledge shall I give you?” She replied, “Your signet and your cord and your staff that is in your hand.” So he gave them to her and went in to her, and she conceived by him. 19 Then she arose and went away, and taking off her veil she put on the garments of her widowhood.

    • A few observations:
      • Judah's (unnamed) wife is dead
      • Shelah was grown up but not given to Tamar
      • Once again a goat is part of the deal, in this case the payment
      • Also, deceit is again used to get a certain outcome
      • Clearly, Judah does what is wrong
    • Technically, Tamar did nothing wrong. She was the righteous person, although her method is certainly questionable
    • Why does Tamar think this is a good idea, ie the  disguise of a prostitute to get Judah?
      • Was Judah's life consistent with the use of prostitutes?
    • Judah is contrasted with Joseph - Joseph avoids sexual sin, the other embraces it

    Genesis 38:20–23 (ESV) —
    20 When Judah sent the young goat by his friend the Adullamite to take back the pledge from the woman’s hand, he did not find her. 21 And he asked the men of the place, “Where is the cult prostitute who was at Enaim at the roadside?” And they said, “No cult prostitute has been here.” 22 So he returned to Judah and said, “I have not found her. Also, the men of the place said, ‘No cult prostitute has been here.’ ” 23 And Judah replied, “Let her keep the things as her own, or we shall be laughed at. You see, I sent this young goat, and you did not find her.”

    • How do we know that Judah knew what he did was unacceptable?
      • To continue to search for her would raise questions, ultimately shaming Judah for seeking a prostitute

    Genesis 38:24–30 (ESV) —
    24 About three months later Judah was told, “Tamar your daughter-in-law has been immoral. Moreover, she is pregnant by immorality.” And Judah said, “Bring her out, and let her be burned.” 25 As she was being brought out, she sent word to her father-in-law, “By the man to whom these belong, I am pregnant.” And she said, “Please identify whose these are, the signet and the cord and the staff.” 26 Then Judah identified them and said, “She is more righteous than I, since I did not give her to my son Shelah.” And he did not know her again.
    27 When the time of her labor came, there were twins in her womb. 28 And when she was in labor, one put out a hand, and the midwife took and tied a scarlet thread on his hand, saying, “This one came out first.” 29 But as he drew back his hand, behold, his brother came out. And she said, “What a breach you have made for yourself!” Therefore his name was called Perez. 30 Afterward his brother came out with the scarlet thread on his hand, and his name was called Zerah.

    • How does Judah react initially to learning of Tamar's pregnancy?
      • He wants to burn her
    • Judah wrongly blames Tamar for the death of his sons
      • His sons died for their sin, not Tamar's
      • Tamar was the innocent party
    • How does Judah react to the identification of her lover?
      • He sees her as more righteous than him
      • He admits to being the person -- he does not justify it
      • He also admits to withholding his younger son
    • Judah is contrasted with his brothers - Judah repents of his sin, his brothers say nothing
    • Technically, the liaison, by the law of the time was an acceptable alternative for the levirate union. Neither actually sinned by the letter of the law / moral of the time. Although, Judah was certainly guilty by the spirit of the law
    • Only two women in the bible have twins, Rebekah and Tamar

    • APPLICATION:
      • A lot is happening during these twenty years. As we will see later, Joseph's cockiness is being erased
      • Judah's anger and self-righteousness is changing
      • Jacob is sulking
      • God is building a nation in spite of the people. In fact, his nation is endangered by the very land they were living in
        • In some ways, the Egyptians will work out better, since they detest shepherds
        • They detest Ebers, Gen 43:32
        • Later they will be slaves too

Gen 37:1-36


    Timeline:
    2006
    Birth of Jacob and Esau
    Gen 25:26
    0 yrs
    1930
    Jacob journeys to Haran
    Gen 28:2
    76 yrs (or 1950: 56)
    1916
    End of Jacob's 14 year labor for his wives
    Gen 29:30

    1916
    Birth of Joseph
    Gen 30:23

    1910
    End of Jacob's stay with Laban
    Gen 31:41
    31:38,41 might suggest 2-20 year periods (Grace, W1972, Zimmerman)
    1905-1899
    Death of Rachel, birth of Benjamin
    Gen 35:16-22

    1899
    Selling of Joseph
    Gen 37:2
    107
    1879
    Beginning of famine
    Gen 41:54

    1878
    Brothers’ first visit to Egypt
    Gen 42:1-2

    1877
    Judah's incest with Tamar
    Gen 38:18

    1877
    Brothers’ second visit to Egypt
    Gen 43:1; 45:6, 11

    1876
    Jacob's descent to Egypt
    Gen 46:6; cf. 47:9
    130
    1845
    Israel is enslaved


    1446
    Israel leaves Egypt after 400 years of bondage
    Gen 15:13,16;Acts 7:6

    1395
    Conquest of Caanan complete (essentially)
    Acts 13:19,20


    Gen 37:1-4 (ESV) Jacob lived in the land of his father's sojournings, in the land of Canaan.

    2 These are the generations of Jacob.

    Joseph, being seventeen years old, was pasturing the flock with his brothers. He was a boy with the sons of Bilhah and Zilpah, his father's wives. And Joseph brought a bad report of them to their father. 3 Now Israel loved Joseph more than any other of his sons, because he was the son of his old age. And he made him a robe of many colors.  4 But when his brothers saw that their father loved him more than all his brothers, they hated him and could not speak peacefully to him.
    Verse 4: The meaning of the Hebrew for richly ornamented is uncertain; also in verses 23 and 32.

    • Now who are we talking about?
      • If answer is Jacob, why the story of Joseph?
      • If answer is Joseph, why does it say it is an account of Jacob (or the generations of Jacob)?
      • Because, it is through Joseph, that God makes Israel into a nation
    • Why might there be some tension between the sons of Bilhah, the sons of Zilpah, and Joseph?
      • While Joseph is 11th born, Joseph is firstborn of Rachel
      • "Second class citizenry"
      • Poor parenting on Jacob's part
        • Continual theme in Genesis--good news is that God can use the results of poor parenting
      • It doesn't mention Leah's son, but Leah was "not loved" which might suggests some animosity between her sons and the Rachel's children.
    • How old is Joseph?
      • 17, this is an important reference point for the purposes of our timeline
      • The famine will begin in 20 years (we know the cupbearer's dream occurs two years before the end)
    • This is the fourth time Jacob is referred to as Israel, not counting the "naming" events
      • Probably has to do with the fact that these events are more about the nation than just Jacob
    • The author is building up a story of animosity toward Joseph? What is the first point?
      • He brought a bad report
      • His brothers were far from perfect. Some of them might even fall into the classification of evil men -- willing to kill others
    • APPLICATION:  God uses imperfect beings.  It's never too late for him to use you

    Gen 37:5-11 (ESV) Now Joseph had a dream, and when he told it to his brothers they hated him even more. 6 He said to them, "Hear this dream that I have dreamed: 7 Behold, we were binding sheaves in the field, and behold, my sheaf arose and stood upright. And behold, your sheaves gathered around it and bowed down to my sheaf." 8 His brothers said to him, "Are you indeed to reign over us? Or are you indeed to rule over us?" So they hated him even more for his dreams and for his words.

    9 Then he dreamed another dream and told it to his brothers and said, "Behold, I have dreamed another dream. Behold, the sun, the moon, and eleven stars were bowing down to me." 10 But when he told it to his father and to his brothers, his father rebuked him and said to him, "What is this dream that you have dreamed? Shall I and your mother and your brothers indeed come to bow ourselves to the ground before you?" 11 And his brothers were jealous of him, but his father kept the saying in mind.

    • What is new, at least as far as Genesis is concerned?
      • The use of dreams WITOUT God speaking
      • "This is the first dream in the Bible in which God does not speak (cf. 20:3; 28:12-15; 31:11, 24). It forms a transition in the dominant means of God's revelation from theophany in Genesis 1—11, to dreams and visions in Genesis 12—35, and now to providence in Genesis 36—50. These three stages resemble the three parts of TaNaK (i.e., the OT). In the Torah ('Law'), God speaks to Moses in theophany; in the Nebiim ('Prophets'), he speaks in dreams and visions; and in the Ketubim ('Writings'), he works mostly through providence."(Waltke, Genesis, p. 500)
    • What is the first dream and meaning, at least as others interpret it?
      • Sheaves of grain
        • Note the agricultural motif
        • The other wheat are coming to Joseph and bowing down
      • Joseph will reign and rule over the brothers
    • What is the second dream and meaning?
      • Sun, moon, and eleven stars were bowing down to Joseph
      • Even Mother and Father to bow down
        • Incidentally, Rachel is already passed away, so these dreams may have occurred while growing up as opposed to when he was 17.  The second "then" only places the one dream after the other
    • Only Jacob, who resents the last dream, seem to show any spiritual discernment
    • How do the stories build up the issue of animosity?
      • Favoritism
      • Ruling over
      • Potential arrogance -- I know that we will see a very humble and wise man, but that story is still 13 years away. I think God changed Joseph. I think God used the evil to bring about good in Joseph's life. Joseph at the end of his life says something similar
    • APPLICATION:  Sometimes we are so involved in life, we don't notice what God is really doing.  Example of time line activity

    Gen 37:12-28 (ESV) Now his brothers went to pasture their father's flock near Shechem. 13 And Israel said to Joseph, "Are not your brothers pasturing the flock at Shechem? Come, I will send you to them." And he said to him, "Here I am." 14 So he said to him, "Go now, see if it is well with your brothers and with the flock, and bring me word." So he sent him from the Valley of Hebron, and he came to Shechem. 15 And a man found him wandering in the fields. And the man asked him, "What are you seeking?" 16 "I am seeking my brothers," he said. "Tell me, please, where they are pasturing the flock." 17 And the man said, "They have gone away, for I heard them say, 'Let us go to Dothan.'" So Joseph went after his brothers and found them at Dothan.

    18 They saw him from afar, and before he came near to them they conspired against him to kill him. 19 They said to one another, "Here comes this dreamer. 20 Come now, let us kill him and throw him into one of the pits. Then we will say that a fierce animal has devoured him, and we will see what will become of his dreams." 21 But when Reuben heard it, he rescued him out of their hands, saying, "Let us not take his life." 22 And Reuben said to them, "Shed no blood; cast him into this pit here in the wilderness, but do not lay a hand on him"— that he might rescue him out of their hand to restore him to his father. 23 So when Joseph came to his brothers, they stripped him of his robe, the robe of many colors that he wore. 24 And they took him and cast him into a pit. The pit was empty; there was no water in it.

    25 Then they sat down to eat. And looking up they saw a caravan of Ishmaelites coming from Gilead, with their camels bearing gum, balm, and myrrh, on their way to carry it down to Egypt. 26 Then Judah said to his brothers, "What profit is it if we kill our brother and conceal his blood? 27 Come, let us sell him to the Ishmaelites, and let not our hand be upon him, for he is our brother, our own flesh." And his brothers listened to him. 28 Then Midianite traders passed by. And they drew Joseph up and lifted him out of the pit, and sold him to the Ishmaelites for twenty shekels of silver. They took Joseph to Egypt.

    • Why might Israel be concerned?
      • They are near Shechem, the site of the massacre
      • There may be others who might want to take revenge
    • The animosity toward Joseph is pretty great, why?
      • The favoritism
      • The special coat (signifies authority)
      • The earlier tattling episode
    • Two individuals try to save Joseph's life, who and why?
      • Reuben the firstborn
        • Possibly because he would be blamed
        • More likely to regain his father's favor
      • Judah, the fourth son, but next in line because of the other two's sin
      • Apparently the majority of the brothers actually agree to the sale, i.e., the emotional moment is passed with a little bit more saneness
    • APPLICATION:  Making decisions when emotional is rarely a good thing

    Gen 37:29-36 (ESV) When Reuben returned to the pit and saw that Joseph was not in the pit, he tore his clothes 30 and returned to his brothers and said, "The boy is gone, and I, where shall I go?" 31 Then they took Joseph's robe and slaughtered a goat and dipped the robe in the blood. 32 And they sent the robe of many colors and brought it to their father and said, "This we have found; please identify whether it is your son's robe or not." 33 And he identified it and said, "It is my son's robe. A fierce animal has devoured him. Joseph is without doubt torn to pieces." 34 Then Jacob tore his garments and put sackcloth on his loins and mourned for his son many days. 35 All his sons and all his daughters rose up to comfort him, but he refused to be comforted and said, "No, I shall go down to Sheol to my son, mourning." Thus his father wept for him. 36 Meanwhile the Midianites had sold him in Egypt to Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh, the captain of the guard.
    Verse 35: Hebrew Sheol
    Verse 36: Samaritan Pentateuch, Septuagint, Vulgate and Syriac (see also verse 28); Masoretic Text Medanites

    • There is some irony here …
      • Jacob had used the skin of a goat to deceive Isaac, his father
      • Jacob's sons use the blood of a goat to deceive Jacob, their father
      • Favorite son rationale (before it was Esau, not it is Joseph)
    • There is also a theme of deception
      • Jacob had deceived his father
      • Laban had deceived Jacob
      • Joseph's brothers deceive their father
      • Joseph deceives his brothers (20 years later in Egypt--but for a different reason)
    • How did Jacob respond to the news?
      • He believed his son was dead
      • He forgot the significance of the dreams
      • Note the callousness of the sons toward their father. They knowingly let him go through tremendous grief on the basis of a lie
    • What is a lesson that God is communicating with verses 35 and 36?
      • From Jacob's perspective all was loss.  He refused to be comforted.  He could see no good
      • From God's perspective, He was at work, using the sons' evil to bring good
    • APPLICATION:
      • We really don't know what God is doing
      • We can not see into the future
      • We need to have faith and trust God to bring good out of what seems so evil
        • Rom 8:28 And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. NIV
        • Gen 50:20 You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives. NIV

Gen 35:16-36:15


    Timeline:
    2006
    Birth of Jacob and Esau
    Gen 25:26
    Jacob: 0 yrs
    1930
    Jacob journeys to Haran
    Gen 28:2

    1916
    End of Jacob's 14 year labor for his wives
    Gen 29:30

    1916
    Birth of Joseph
    Gen 30:23

    1910
    End of Jacob's stay with Laban
    Gen 31:41

    1905-1899
    Death of Rachel, birth of Benjamin
    Gen 35:16-22

    1899
    Selling of Joseph
    Gen 37:2
    107
    1879
    Beginning of famine
    Gen 41:54

    1878
    Brothers’ first visit to Egypt
    Gen 42:1-2

    1877
    Judah's incest with Tamar
    Gen 38:18

    1877
    Brothers’ second visit to Egypt
    Gen 43:1; 45:6, 11

    1876
    Jacob's descent to Egypt
    Gen 46:6; cf. 47:9
    130 yrs
    1845
    Israel is enslaved


    1446
    Israel leaves Egypt after 400 years of bondage
    Gen 15:13,16;Acts 7:6

    1395
    Conquest of Caanan complete (essentially)
    Acts 13:19,20


    Genesis 35:16–29 (ESV) —
    16 Then they journeyed from Bethel. When they were still some distance from Ephrath, Rachel went into labor, and she had hard labor. 17 And when her labor was at its hardest, the midwife said to her, “Do not fear, for you have another son.” 18 And as her soul was departing (for she was dying), she called his name Ben-oni; but his father called him Benjamin. 19 So Rachel died, and she was buried on the way to Ephrath (that is, Bethlehem), 20 and Jacob set up a pillar over her tomb. It is the pillar of Rachel’s tomb, which is there to this day. 21 Israel journeyed on and pitched his tent beyond the tower of Eder.
    22 While Israel lived in that land, Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father’s concubine. And Israel heard of it.
    Now the sons of Jacob were twelve. 23 The sons of Leah: Reuben (Jacob’s firstborn), Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, and Zebulun. 24 The sons of Rachel: Joseph and Benjamin. 25 The sons of Bilhah, Rachel’s servant: Dan and Naphtali. 26 The sons of Zilpah, Leah’s servant: Gad and Asher. These were the sons of Jacob who were born to him in Paddan-aram.
    27 And Jacob came to his father Isaac at Mamre, or Kiriath-arba (that is, Hebron), where Abraham and Isaac had sojourned. 28 Now the days of Isaac were 180 years. 29 And Isaac breathed his last, and he died and was gathered to his people, old and full of days. And his sons Esau and Jacob buried him.

    • This is the final son of the 12. Scholars place this between 1905-1899 AD
      • Joseph would be between 11 and 16 years older than Benjamin
      • His other brothers could be as much as 16 to 30 years older
    • Why move away from Bethel?
      • It does not say
      • Proper hermeneutics, without any passages to say, it would be spiritualizing or guessing
    • There is a lot of interesting points to make without going too far in regards to Rachel. Do you remember what she said to Jacob when Leah had 4 children and she had none?
      • "Give me children or else I die" (30:1)
      • Leah wasn't much better, what did she want?
        • Her husband to love her
        • By her fourth son, Judah she would finally say, "I will just praise the Lord" (29:35)
      • Rachel and Leah are just like us, Why?
        • APPLICATION: There are never content with their blessings or what they have, life is always about what you don't have
    • Another observation concerning Rachel. What did Jacob say to Laban that involved Rachel?
      • The person had his household gods would die
      • Fortunately, curses don't work that way
        • It is true that our words can kill and give life, but not in the sense that a cult might believe
        • The Bible says that God is sovereign and also gives man free will
    • Rachel's death at Ramah is used in another prophecy (Jer 31:15  and Matt 2:18)
      • Jeremiah 31:15 (ESV) — 15 Thus says the Lord:
    “A voice is heard in Ramah,
    lamentation and bitter weeping.
    Rachel is weeping for her children;
    she refuses to be comforted for her children,
    because they are no more.”
    • Matthew 2:16–18 (ESV) —
    16 Then Herod, when he saw that he had been tricked by the wise men, became furious, and he sent and killed all the male children in Bethlehem and in all that region who were two years old or under, according to the time that he had ascertained from the wise men. 17 Then was fulfilled what was spoken by the prophet Jeremiah:
    18 “A voice was heard in Ramah,
    weeping and loud lamentation,
    Rachel weeping for her children;
    she refused to be comforted, because they are no more.”
    • We know this is metaphorical because of what Hermeneutical principle?
      • First, The Bible was written in common Greek and Hebrew and was to be read like any other book
      • Secondly, the verse does not make sense when read literally
    • This occurs at Bethlehem, not Ramah, but they are close. So what is the connection?
      • It is not the location
      • It is the feeling of a mother
        • Rachel lost her children (in a sense) because she died -- that is why Ben-oni is the name -- it was the son of her pain
        • Israel renames the son, Benjamin -- the son of my good fortune
          • Not because Rachel died, but because it was a positive view of the birth
          • No child desires to be known as the one whose birth killed their mother
    • I only have a few points on Reuben. What number child was he?
      • He was the oldest
      • His action here invalidates him from being in the line of the Messiah
      • Reuben may have wanted to prevent Rachel’s maid from succeeding Rachel as his father’s favorite wife. He probably resented the fact that Jacob did not honor his mother. (Wehnham)
      • Reuben’s act constituted a claim against (a challenge to) his father as well as being an immoral act (cf. Deut. 22:30; 2 Sam. 16:21–22; 1 Kings 2:13–25). In the ancient Near East a man who wanted to assert his superiority over another man might do so by having sexual relations with that man’s wife or concubine (cf. 2 Sam. 16:21–22). Ancient Near Easterners regarded this act of physical domination as an evidence of personal domination. (Constable)
      • The act is gross, and has to be understood hermeneutically
        • The Bible accurately records the events
        • The Bible does not endorse the actions relayed, unless in a didactic portion there is teaching supporting the action or commentary from God
    • Reminder Bilhah is Rachel's maid

    Genesis 36:1–8 (ESV) —
    1 These are the generations of Esau (that is, Edom). 2 Esau took his wives from the Canaanites: Adah the daughter of Elon the Hittite, Oholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite, 3 and Basemath, Ishmael’s daughter, the sister of Nebaioth. 4 And Adah bore to Esau, Eliphaz; Basemath bore Reuel; 5 and Oholibamah bore Jeush, Jalam, and Korah. These are the sons of Esau who were born to him in the land of Canaan.
    6 Then Esau took his wives, his sons, his daughters, and all the members of his household, his livestock, all his beasts, and all his property that he had acquired in the land of Canaan. He went into a land away from his brother Jacob. 7 For their possessions were too great for them to dwell together. The land of their sojournings could not support them because of their livestock. 8 So Esau settled in the hill country of Seir. (Esau is Edom.)

    • The first thing to note is the names of the wives appear to be different from what Moses had originally recorded
      • This was fairly common practice in that region to change the name after marriage
      • The Israelites do not appear to use the practice
    • The second thing is we have this separation of the families due to their wealth
      • So these were nomadic tribes -- they moved around quite a bit. By the way, they still do this today in parts of Saudi Arabia (although usually staying within range of cell phone towers)
      • Originally, when Jacob arrived in the land, where was Esau living?
        • In Seir
        • Now we find Esau living in the land of Canaan
        • Apparently, he liked that area and he decides to move

    Genesis 36:9–15 (ESV) —
    9 These are the generations of Esau the father of the Edomites in the hill country of Seir. 10 These are the names of Esau’s sons: Eliphaz the son of Adah the wife of Esau, Reuel the son of Basemath the wife of Esau. 11 The sons of Eliphaz were Teman, Omar, Zepho, Gatam, and Kenaz. 12 (Timna was a concubine of Eliphaz, Esau’s son; she bore Amalek to Eliphaz.) These are the sons of Adah, Esau’s wife. 13 These are the sons of Reuel: Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, and Mizzah. These are the sons of Basemath, Esau’s wife. 14 These are the sons of Oholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon, Esau’s wife: she bore to Esau Jeush, Jalam, and Korah.
    15 These are the chiefs of the sons of Esau. The sons of Eliphaz the firstborn of Esau: the chiefs Teman, Omar, Zepho, Kenaz,

    • I made you suffer through this to point out a few names to highlight a few nations that come from Esau. Do you notice a couple of them?
      • So verse 12 is the origin of the Amalekites. Saul defeated them in his reign as well as David in his reign
      • So verses 11, and 15 introduce us to the Kenizzites who later affiliate with the tribe of Judah
    • We are not reading the remaining names, but here are some observations
      • The king list (vs 31-39) reflects elective kingship rather than a dynastic rule

    APPLICATION:
    • Are we content with life or are we do spend our life living for the next big thing
      • Example of weekends, holidays, and summer in college
    • Secondly, our actions have consequences
      • Reuben's actions remove him from the line of the Messiah
      • Later, we will see a slightly similar situation with Judah that does not remove him from the line of the messiah. We need to understand the differences