Saturday, March 23, 2019

Job 2 Taking away our belief that we can fix our problems


    Job 2:1–6 (RSV)
    1 Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them to present himself before the Lord. 2 And the Lord said to Satan, “Whence have you come?” Satan answered the Lord, “From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking up and down on it.” 3 And the Lord said to Satan, “Have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil? He still holds fast his integrity, although you moved me against him, to destroy him without cause.” 4 Then Satan answered the Lord, “Skin for skin! All that a man has he will give for his life. 5 But put forth thy hand now, and touch his bone and his flesh, and he will curse thee to thy face.” 6 And the Lord said to Satan, “Behold, he is in your power; only spare his life.”

    • Who took action against Job according to God?
      • God takes the blame (see verse 3) -- "although you moved me against him"
      • Remember: Did God give specific instruction to Satan in terms of what he was to do to Job?
        • No. He gave latitude and limits
    • What is God's assessment of Job?
      • None like him on earth
      • Blameless and upright
      • Fears God and turns away from evil
      • Holds fast to his integrity
    • What is Satan's response?
      • Once again cynical
      • Assumes Job is very selfish or narcissist and in the end, all that he cares about is his own skin
      • Satan boasts that if you touch his skin, he will curse thee to your face
    • Once again, God allows Satan to act with one proviso …
      • His life must be saved
      • Implies that Satan could kill with God's permission

    Job 2:7–13 (RSV)
    7 So Satan went forth from the presence of the Lord, and afflicted Job with loathsome sores from the sole of his foot to the crown of his head. 8 And he took a potsherd with which to scrape himself, and sat among the ashes.
    9 Then his wife said to him, “Do you still hold fast your integrity? Curse God, and die.” 10 But he said to her, “You speak as one of the foolish women would speak. Shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil?” In all this Job did not sin with his lips.
    11 Now when Job’s three friends heard of all this evil that had come upon him, they came each from his own place, Eliphaz the Temanite, Bildad the Shuhite, and Zophar the Naamathite. They made an appointment together to come to condole with him and comfort him. 12 And when they saw him from afar, they did not recognize him; and they raised their voices and wept; and they rent their robes and sprinkled dust upon their heads toward heaven. 13 And they sat with him on the ground seven days and seven nights, and no one spoke a word to him, for they saw that his suffering was very great.

    • This last piece of suffering comes directly from Satan (with God's permission)
      • This is the last mention of Satan in the book
      • Satan is actually a bit player in this story
      • Satan is never mentioned by God, Job, the three friends, or Elihu as the cause of suffering
      • Satan is not important
    • We tend to be negative toward Job's wife. There are other possibilities.
      • I can imagine situations when the person is so sick and tired of hearing the complaining of the sufferer, that the person says the same thing. "Stop believing then" - it will be easier to live with you
      • The wife was hurting too. Her response is not unusual in great pain
      • My example: http://qt-notes.blogspot.com/2012/07/ 
    • Job's response to his wife is logical, after 7 days it will shift to emotional
      • People go through a range of responses to suffering
      • It is not always the same. Be careful what you say. It is best to agree gently and just listen
    • Three observations on Job's three friend's visit
      • One, they found the time to spend seven days with Job
      • Two, they were perfect friends for seven days. They wept with Job
      • Three, They did not speak a word to him
    • So what goes wrong?
      • Nothing really. But, Job's initial stoicism quickly fades
      • They feel compelled to respond the Job's complaints
        • This is always a danger when responding to a person in great pain
        • And it doesn't help if what you say is not true
      • They use incorrect theology (Elihu is not criticized)

    APPLICATION:
    1. Satan is a bit player in the book and ignored
    2. Job's friends were great. They took off work for  seven days. They wept and spent time with Job saying nothing. They did everything right … until Job's emotions broke through his stoicism
    3. Their theology was human based -- "God blesses the righteous with health and wealth." God curses the wicked. Therefore you must be wicked.

Monday, March 18, 2019

Job 1 God setting the stage


  • Genre: Poetry and Wisdom literature
  • Persons: Job, God, Satan, Job's wife, Eliphaz, Bildad, Zophar, Elihu
  • Map
Machine generated alternative text:
Meso- 
p o tmnia 
Damascus 
(heat Sea 
Tigris R. 
Euphrates R. 
Dead 
Sea 
Arabian 
Desert 
Red 
Sea
Constable, Job, 2012
  • Themes and Arguments:
    • Bandstra, Barry L. “Job, Book of.” Ed. Mark Allan Powell. The HarperCollins Bible Dictionary (Revised and Updated) 2011 : 475. Print.
      • (1) human suffering does not necessarily happen with cause or reason, even though it is natural for people to look for such a cause or reason;
      • (2) the role of deity in relation to suffering is not necessarily discernible, even though people presume deity must play a role; and
      • (3) extreme suffering leads people to question the integrity of the victim or the deity, but such judgments are questionable at best and likely to distort or oversimplify the realities of life.
    • Hunt, Harry. “Job, Book Of.” Ed. Chad Brand et al. Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary 2003 : 924–925. Print.
      • (1) One suggestion … why the righteous suffer. …  ancient society believed that human suffering was the result of one’s sin or at least a god’s displeasure. Even the meaning of the name Job (the persecuted one) seems to support this suggestion…
      • (2)  Another … suggestion is that the book has been preserved to illustrate for us the nature of true faith both from the point of view of people and of God. For humans, it is trusting in God as the Creator and Sustainer of life even when all is not going well and when He is not visibly present to help us.
      • (3)  Another, and much less frequently suggested purpose, is that of a parable concerning the nation of Israel. In this case, Job becomes the nation Israel.
    • Smith, William. Smith’s Bible Dictionary 1986 : Print.
      • (1) One question could be raised by envy: may not the goodness which secures such direct and tangible rewards be a refined form of selfishness? Satan, the accusing angel, suggests the doubt, “Doth Job fear God for nought?” and asserts boldly that if those external blessings were withdrawn, Job would cast off his allegiance—“he will curse thee to thy face.” … can goodness exist irrespective of reward?
      • (2)  Job’s friends hold the theory that there is an exact and invariable correlation between sin and suffering. The fact of suffering proves the commission of some special sin. They apply this to Job, but he disavows all special guilt.  
      • (3) The leading principle of Elihu’s statement is that calamity, in the shape of trial, is inflicted on comparatively the best of men; but that God allows a favorable turn to take place as soon as its object has been realized.
    • My opinion
      • Three observations on two key characters (God, Satan)
        • Satan does not originally bring up Job, God does
        • Satan does not reflect on Job's calamities, God does
        • Satan does not summarize or talk at the end, God does
      • Two observations on Job
        • Job was the richest man on the earth
        • Job was one of the wisest men on the earth
      • Two discussion topics of God to Job at the end
        • Job's riches (power) and wisdom (knowledge) as compared to God, is the main point of God's response to Job at the end of the book
      • Two responses of Job to God at the end
        • Job ("who did not sin in his words") repents twice at the end of the book
      • CONCLUSION: It is not easy to understand what or why God allows or initiates actions, but God is not without purpose
  • Timeline
    • Ranges from Abraham to sixth century BC
    • Job lived to either 140 or 210 (42:16). Terah lived 205, Abraham (175), Isaac (180) and Jacob (147).
    • Job's wife has ten children (fully grown) and then later starts another 13 (so this would be the time of Abraham or even early Genesis

Job 1:1–5 (RSV)
1 There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job; and that man was blameless and upright, one who feared God, and turned away from evil. 2 There were born to him seven sons and three daughters. 3 He had seven thousand sheep, three thousand camels, five hundred yoke of oxen, and five hundred she-asses, and very many servants; so that this man was the greatest of all the people of the east. 4 His sons used to go and hold a feast in the house of each on his day; and they would send and invite their three sisters to eat and drink with them. 5 And when the days of the feast had run their course, Job would send and sanctify them, and he would rise early in the morning and offer burnt offerings according to the number of them all; for Job said, “It may be that my sons have sinned, and cursed God in their hearts.” Thus Job did continually.

  • Observations about Job
    • Spiritually: He feared God
      • Meaning he obeyed God's laws as he understood them
      • He did the right thing (integrity)
      • He did not obtain his wealth through shady means
    • Relationally: He had a wife and ten children
      • His grown children often had feasts
        • Job felt compelled to offer burn offerings for them (in case they sinned)
        • NOTE: this is the first evidence of something not correct
          • Why do his children not offer sacrifices for their sin
          • His children, possibly, did not necessarily share all of his values
    • Important Financially: He was very wealthy
      • He had 4 classes of animals: sheep, camels, oxen, and donkeys
      • He had many servants (employees working for him)
    • Important Intellectually (Wisdom): Job recognized the danger of sin and took actions to prevent its effects
      • Job 4:3–4 (RSV)
3 Behold, you have instructed many,
and you have strengthened the weak hands.
4 Your words have upheld him who was stumbling,
and you have made firm the feeble knees.
  • Application:
    • We don't know that Job trusted in his wealth (power) or in his wisdom at this point. We will have to wait until the end to find out what God spends his time discussing with Job
      • Does God focus on evil and the random nature of suffering?
      • Does God focus on the problem of Satan in the world?
      • Does God talk about something else, seemingly without connection?
      • Does God talk to his friends or does God talk to Job?
      • Why does God talk to Job?
    • Possibly Job had two issues in his life. He trusted in his wealth and power. And He trusted in his knowledge and wisdom

Job 1:6–12 (RSV)
6 Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them. 7 The Lord said to Satan, “Whence have you come?” Satan answered the Lord, “From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking up and down on it.” 8 And the Lord said to Satan, “Have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil?” 9 Then Satan answered the Lord, “Does Job fear God for nought? 10 Hast thou not put a hedge about him and his house and all that he has, on every side? Thou hast blessed the work of his hands, and his possessions have increased in the land. 11 But put forth thy hand now, and touch all that he has, and he will curse thee to thy face.” 12 And the Lord said to Satan, “Behold, all that he has is in your power; only upon himself do not put forth your hand.” So Satan went forth from the presence of the Lord.

  • Observations:
    • Satan is either one of the sons of God, or more likely not, since he is added to the list
    • Are there celestial staff meetings? There are regular gatherings. 1 Peter suggests the same
    • Angels have work
    • One purpose of the work (at least for Satan) seems to be "to consider the occupants"
  • Who initiates the discussion with Satan?
    • God
    • Remember that when God asks a question, it is not to get an answer. In this case, why does God ask Satan where he came from? Probably, because God has a purpose for the conversation
    • What is Satan's initial answer? He is roaming the planet
  • Who initiates the discussion about Job?
    • God
  • What is Satan's response, and how does it fit in this idea of a celestial staff meeting?
    • Satan does know the individual (suggests a very good memory)
    • Satan has also made conclusions. Job does the right thing because God has protected his life from pain
      • This is a key misperception and it also comes from Satan: Good deeds results in God's blessing  (and Satan also argues it as a self-licking ice cream cone)
    • Also note the attitude of Satan toward Job's behavior -- cynicism
  • Satan argues that suffering will cause Job to turn from God. Is that true?
    • Yes. There are many examples of people who use a severe loss as evidence that God does not exist. Or if he exists, then they would not want to worship a  God who works in that way
    • No. It does not cause all people to dump their faith. More often it at least initially forces people to God
  • What is implied about God's sovereignty?
    • His approval is required for actions from his agents
    • He had protected Job in some way (a fence around him). Not clear what the fence protected him from (only the sons of God). The physical and natural calamities are directed by outside forces
  • Finally, Satan actions are controlled by God

Job 1:13–22 (RSV)
13 Now there was a day when his sons and daughters were eating and drinking wine in their eldest brother’s house; 14 and there came a messenger to Job, and said, “The oxen were plowing and the asses feeding beside them; 15 and the Sabeans fell upon them and took them, and slew the servants with the edge of the sword; and I alone have escaped to tell you.” 16 While he was yet speaking, there came another, and said, “The fire of God fell from heaven and burned up the sheep and the servants, and consumed them; and I alone have escaped to tell you.” 17 While he was yet speaking, there came another, and said, “The Chaldeans formed three companies, and made a raid upon the camels and took them, and slew the servants with the edge of the sword; and I alone have escaped to tell you.” 18 While he was yet speaking, there came another, and said, “Your sons and daughters were eating and drinking wine in their eldest brother’s house; 19 and behold, a great wind came across the wilderness, and struck the four corners of the house, and it fell upon the young people, and they are dead; and I alone have escaped to tell you.”
20 Then Job arose, and rent his robe, and shaved his head, and fell upon the ground, and worshiped. 21 And he said, “Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return; the Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.”
22 In all this Job did not sin or charge God with wrong.

  • First test: observations on the disasters:
    • Evil persons (or greedy) Sabeans attack oxen, donkeys, and servants
    • "Extremely unusual" phenomena, Fire "of God from Heaven" fell and burned sheep and servants
    • Evil persons, Chaldeans, attack camels and servants
    • Natural phenomena, great wind, kills sons and daughters
  • Job's response
    • Classic stoic response -- Naked I came, naked I shall return, blessed be the Lord
      • KEY: This is not the full story of Job's response and maybe more an initial shock response
    • Tearing of robe is typical manner to express grief
    • He does not charge God with wrongdoing (not yet at least)

APPLICATION:
  1. God was not unware of any of Job's life or his sufferings
  2. The scripture subtly hints at aspects of Job's life which may be important: very wealthy and very wise

Sunday, March 10, 2019

Gen 10:1-11:32


    Read Genesis 10

    • Discuss Nations of Gen 10 (
    Error in Philistia. It should be Orange (for Ham) )
    • 3 Sons
      • Shem: 26
      • Ham: 30
      • Japheth: 14
    • 70 Nations
      • Jacob's family will also comprise 70 people, representing Israel as a new beginning
      • Jesus' disciples will have a component of 70 representing still another new beginning
    • The emphasis is on the nations that play a key role in Israel's future
      • Shem: 3rd Arphaxad: Shelah: Eber: Peleg(divided) & Joktan (13 sons)
        • Peleg: Reu: Serug: Nahor: Terah (Abram, Nahor, & Haran)
        • Note that the two sons of Eber, Peleg and Joktan eventually split with one becoming the promised people (Abram) and the other the people of Babylon
    • This chapter contains one of the oldest, if not the oldest, ethnological table in the literature of the ancient world. It reveals a remarkable understanding of the ethnic and linguistic situation following the Flood. Almost all the names in this chapter have been found in archaeological discoveries in the last century and a half. Many of them appear in subsequent books of the Old Testament.
    • Table is horizontal not vertical indicating the purpose is not to show a line but to show political, geographical, and ethnic affiliations among the tribes (for various reasons)
    • Notice the lifespan decreases (chapter 11) https://www.bible-history.com/old-testament/lifespans.html

    Gen 11:1-4 (ESV) Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. 2 And as people migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there. 3 And they said to one another, "Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly." And they had brick for stone, and bitumen for mortar. 4 Then they said, "Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth."

    • How does chapter 11 fit with chapter 10
      • Chapter 10 finishes the narrative on Noah's sons
      • Chapter 10 even places the event of chapter 11 during the time of Peleg (vs. 25)
      • Chapter 11 flashes back to events inside of chapter 10 (both before and after)
    • When you read this on the surface, what do you come away with that was happening?
      • Progress
      • Growth
    • See 10:8.  While it is possible Nimrod (or Sagan) was the ruler at the time, it would mean that Nimrod was one of the last of Cush's son (Peleg's birth was only 132 years after the flood) -- that would line it up with Peleg
      • Nimrod means "we shall rebel" (Blosser)
      • How does the name affect our view of what may have been happening?
        • Rebellion against God
        • We can ascend to heaven and defeat God (implication of verse 4)
        • The establishment of a one world government (since man was now given authority over even a man's life)
          • I'm actually not against the concept of a one world government (the millennium will have one)
          • What are the dangers of a one world government or the advantages of multiple governments?
          • Nimrod was the first megalomaniac. He wanted to rule everything
    • Also, how do verses 1-4 relate to God's command in 1:28 and 9:1? (Especially 11:2 and 11:4)?
      • Gen 1:28 (ESV) And God blessed them. And God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth."
      • Gen 9:1 (ESV) And God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth.
      • God said to fill the earth; the attempt here is to keep everyone together
    • APPLICATION: What has God told us to do that we are subtly ignoring or replacing with other "good" things?

    Gen 11:5-9 (ESV) And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of man had built. 6 And the Lord said, "Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. 7 Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another's speech." 8 So the Lord dispersed them from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city. 9 Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language of all the earth. And from there the Lord dispersed them over the face of all the earth.

    • Why does God use the term "come down"?  He is everywhere and knew what was happening.
      • God's soliloquy mimics the language of the tower builders in verses 3 & 4, possibly the tower is so puny, that God has to come down to see it
      • Emphasizes the fact that God wants a relationship with people; He wants to help them
    • What was God's real concern in verses 6 and 7?
      • God was protecting the people from their own rebellion
      • In a very short time, they were already considering invading heaven (some commentators)
        • I think that is why Nimrod is called a mighty hunter and named a rebel
      • The result of God's action is that the people are forced to do what God had commanded them to do earlier
    • What does the word "Babel" mean?
      • It means confusion in Hebrew
      • It means "the gate of gods" in Babylonian
    • APPLICATION:  We only think that we are in charge of human destiny

    Read Gen 11:10-26 to see how the ages are declining. Why not an immediate decline

    Gen 11:27-12:1 (ESV) Now these are the generations of Terah. Terah fathered Abram, Nahor, and Haran; and Haran fathered Lot. 28 Haran died in the presence of his father Terah in the land of his kindred, in Ur of the Chaldeans. 29 And Abram and Nahor took wives. The name of Abram's wife was Sarai, and the name of Nahor's wife, Milcah, the daughter of Haran the father of Milcah and Iscah. 30 Now Sarai was barren; she had no child.

    31 Terah took Abram his son and Lot the son of Haran, his grandson, and Sarai his daughter-in-law, his son Abram's wife, and they went forth together from Ur of the Chaldeans to go into the land of Canaan, but when they came to Haran, they settled there. 32 The days of Terah were 205 years, and Terah died in Haran.

    12:1 Now the Lord said to Abram, "Go from your country and your kindred and your father's house to the land that I will show you.



                  PATRIARCHAL CHRONOLOGICAL DATA41


    2236

    Birth of Terah

    Gen 11:24

    2166

    Birth of Abram

    Gen 11:27

    2091

    Abram's departure from Haran

    Gen 12:4

    2081

    Abram's marriage to Hagar

    Gen 16:3

    2080

    Birth of Ishmael

    Gen 16:16

    • Lineage
      • Nahor
      • Terah
      • Abram (marries Sarai, see Gen 20:12), Haran (dies in Ur), Terah (marries Milcah; have Lot)
    • Terah sets out from Ur to go to Caanan with Abram, Lot, and Sarai.  They arrive in Haran and settle there.
      • Verse 12:1 immediately follows … what does that make you think?
      • Gen 15:7 & Neh 9:7 suggests that it was not Terah's idea but God's
      • Gen 15:7 (ESV) And he said to him, "I am the Lord who brought you out from Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to possess."
      • Neh 9:7 (ESV) You are the Lord, the God who chose Abram and brought him out of Ur of the Chaldeans and gave him the name Abraham. 8  You found his heart faithful before you, and made with him the covenant to give to his offspring the land of the Canaanite, the Hittite, the Amorite, the Perizzite, the Jebusite, and the Girgashite. And you have kept your promise, for you are righteous.
      • Acts suggests that God gave the command to Abraham--how do we fit them together?
      • Acts 7:2-4 (ESV) And Stephen said:  "Brothers and fathers, hear me. The God of glory appeared to our father Abraham when he was in Mesopotamia, before he lived in Haran, 3 and said to him, 'Go out from your land and from your kindred and go into the land that I will show you.' 4  Then he went out from the land of the Chaldeans and lived in Haran. And after his father died, God removed him from there into this land in which you are now living.
        • One possibility is that the original command is given to Terah, but he fails to fulfill it and so it then goes to his son
        • Another possibility is that both heard the original command and committed themselves to it, but Terah as head of the family stopped short, and Abram finished it
        • A third possibility is that the command went to Abram, and he convinced Terah to come with him
      • Why Caanan?  Judgment against their sin
    • APPLICATION:  What makes one person different from another?  Why does one person follow God and not another?  What is the difference Terah and Abram?  Terah took a step and stop in Haran.  Abram took a step and continue.  Abram, although lived by faith, and believed in the unseen and seen.  Abram obeyed.
      • Nahor found life good in Haran. The weeds choked him

Gen 9:1-29


    • Review:
    Previous passage ends the long chiastic structure

    Gen 9:1-7 (ESV) And God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth. 2  The fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth and upon every bird of the heavens, upon everything that creeps on the ground and all the fish of the sea. Into your hand they are delivered. 3  Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything. 4 But you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood. 5 And for your lifeblood I will require a reckoning: from every beast I will require it and from man. From his fellow man I will require a reckoning for the life of man.

    6  "Whoever sheds the blood of man,
    by man shall his blood be shed,
     for God made man in his own image.

    7 And you, be fruitful and multiply, teem on the earth and multiply in it."

    • This is what is called the stewardship (or age or dispensation) of human government
      • Title is because God gives man authority over the life of other men
    • What are the aspects associated with this age?
      1. Be fruitful, increase, & fill the earth
      2. Fear of man in animals
      3. All things are food, not just the green plants
        1. Previously, implication was vegetables
        2. Now, all meat is okay
        3. In the Mosaic covenant, only certain meat is okay
        4. In the New Covenant, all meat is okay
    ==> This is not contradiction but rather a confirmation of different rules for different periods of time
    1. Cannot eat / drink blood
    2. Can execute capital punishment (but vss 4,5 show that life is sacred)
    • Life has changed; the environment has changed; the rules & commands have changed
      • What are the typical responses to change in life?
        • Complain
        • Wish for the good old days
        • Bitterness
        • Accept
      • While acceptance is the right response, sometimes it does take people some time emotionally to respond
    • Dispensations
      • Defn: A dispensation is a distinguishable economy in the outworking of God's purpose
      • Salvation is always by faith
      • NT word, seen in Eph 1:10; 3:2; and Col 1:25-26
        • Eph 1:10 (ESV) … as a plan for the fullness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth.
          • "plan" is Greek oikonomian, strong's 3633, meaning dispensation
        • Eph 3:1-3 (ESV) For this reason I, Paul, a prisoner for Christ Jesus on behalf of you Gentiles— 2 assuming that you have heard of the stewardship of God's grace that was given to me for you, 3  how the mystery was made known to me by revelation, as I have written briefly.
          • "stewardship is Greek word for dispensation
        • Col 1:24-26 (ESV) Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I am filling up what is lacking in Christ's afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church, 25  of which I became a minister according to the stewardship from God that was given to me for you, to make the word of God fully known, 26  the mystery hidden for ages and generations but now revealed to his saints.
      • Each time, it either references a plan or a mystery now being revealed, which carries the idea of something different
      • Characterization of a dispensation
        • Chief person
        • Man's responsibility
        • Man's specific test
        • Man's failure
        • Man's judgment
        • God's display of Grace
    • 7 Main Stewardships
      1. Dispensation of Innocence or Freedom
        1. Responsibility: Care for earth, subdue it, replenish it
        2. Test: Tree of knowledge of good and evil
        3. Failure: Could not keep one rule
        4. Judgment: expelled from the garden -- couldn't eat of the tree of life
        5. God's grace: the promise of a redeemer (Gen 3:15)
      2. Dispensation of Conscience or Self Determination
        1. Respond to God as prompted by conscience (as seen in Abel)
        2. Responsibilities: Adamic covenant continued. Speculate that there were other things not mentioned in the text, since Cain and Abel understood sacrifice. Even Noah understood clean and unclean animals. Also Faith in the coming Messiah
        3. Test: Obedience to the knowledge of good and evil (God pretty much states that much to Cain before his murder of Abel)
        4. Failure: Cain failed to bring the right sacrifice. The people of the world continually sinned, even though they knew right and wrong
        5. Judgment: worldwide flood
        6. God's grace: Salvation of Noah and his family
      3. Dispensation of Civil Government (SAVE FOR DISCUSSION LATER ON)
        1. Responsibilities
          1. Capital punishment (compare 4:14,15) -- implies submission to governing authorities
          2. Can eat meat
          3. Told to spread out and fill the earth
        2. Test: Requirement to fill the earth
        3. Failure: Tower of Babel and refusal to spread out
        4. Judgment: confusion of tongues. Now people are forced to disperse to avoid turmoil, confusion, and conflict
        5. God's Grace: God's preserves a remnant through the line of Shem, the Semitic groups, that would one day produce the Messiah
      4. Dispensation of Promise or Patriarchal Rule
      5. Dispensation of the Law
      6. Dispensation of Grace
      7. Dispensation of the Kingdom or Millennium

    Genesis 9:8–17 (ESV) —
    8 Then God said to Noah and to his sons with him, 9 “Behold, I establish my covenant with you and your offspring after you, 10 and with every living creature that is with you, the birds, the livestock, and every beast of the earth with you, as many as came out of the ark; it is for every beast of the earth. 11 I establish my covenant with you, that never again shall all flesh be cut off by the waters of the flood, and never again shall there be a flood to destroy the earth.” 12 And God said, “This is the sign of the covenant that I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for all future generations: 13 I have set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between me and the earth. 14 When I bring clouds over the earth and the bow is seen in the clouds, 15 I will remember my covenant that is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh. And the waters shall never again become a flood to destroy all flesh. 16 When the bow is in the clouds, I will see it and remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is on the earth.” 17 God said to Noah, “This is the sign of the covenant that I have established between me and all flesh that is on the earth.”

    • What type of covenant is this one?
      • Unconditional and a suzerainty covenant (higher with lower)
      • While the age / stewardship has stipulations, the covenant does not have any on man, only God
    • Promise of the covenant
      • Flood will not destroy the whole earth
      • Rainbow as a reminder
        • Possibly first existence of a rainbow since the earth was watered by a mist from the ground
        • Now rain came from the sky and so the rainbow would be a natural result of that change
        • Or, rainbows existed before and now received a new significance (not my belief)
    • Once again, we see God "remembers" indicating two things
      1. Communicating to man in terms that man will understand
      2. God will directly intervene
    • Does God need a rainbow to remember?
      • No, the rainbow reminds us, not God of what he has done, and
      • What he will do, and
      • What he won't do
    • So far there has been a common pattern in the dispensations, what are they?
      • Specific rules
      • Failure on the part of man
      • Judgment

    APPLICATION:
    Recognizing that life is sacred

    Genesis 9:18–29 (ESV) —
    18 The sons of Noah who went forth from the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. (Ham was the father of Canaan.) 19 These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the people of the whole earth were dispersed.
    20 Noah began to be a man of the soil, and he planted a vineyard. 21 He drank of the wine and became drunk and lay uncovered in his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father and told his two brothers outside. 23 Then Shem and Japheth took a garment, laid it on both their shoulders, and walked backward and covered the nakedness of their father. Their faces were turned backward, and they did not see their father’s nakedness. 24 When Noah awoke from his wine and knew what his youngest son had done to him, 25 he said,
    “Cursed be Canaan;
    a servant of servants shall he be to his brothers.”
    26 He also said,
    “Blessed be the Lord, the God of Shem;
    and let Canaan be his servant.
    27 May God enlarge Japheth,
    and let him dwell in the tents of Shem,
    and let Canaan be his servant.”
    28 After the flood Noah lived 350 years. 29 All the days of Noah were 950 years, and he died.

    • Two examples of failure, and two examples of "doing the right thing"
      • Scripture never glosses over men's fault. Noah was a godly man but he failed here, Why?
        • He lost self-control
        • He overindulged in alcohol
      • What is Ham's mistake?
        • Constable:
          • Ham’s gazing on Noah’s nakedness represents an early step in the abandonment of the moral code after the Flood.
          • Ham dishonored Noah not by seeing him naked but by his outspoken delight in his father’s condition
        • Allen P. Ross (Bib Sacra, 1980): It is difficult for someone living in the modern world to understand the modesty and discretion of privacy called for in ancient morality. Nakedness in the OT was from the beginning a thing of shame for fallen man [Gen 3:7] . . . the state of nakedness was both undignified and vulnerable. . . . To see someone uncovered was to bring dishonor and to gain advantage for potential exploitation.”
        • Ham could have acted differently, but he acted shamefully. Instead of protecting his Father, he seem to enjoy his Father's failure
      • The other two protect their Father's honor. Apparently, Shem takes the lead
        • Sin is not to be taken lightly
        • Sin is not to be laughed at
        • Sin is not to be reveled in
    • The importance of this passage is that once again we define two different approaches and two different lines
      • One line laughs at and enjoys sin
      • The other line takes action in opposition to sin

    APPLICATION:
    1. God still judges sin today.  Emphasizes the importance of repentance and reliance on God's mercy
      1. What is our reaction to sin?
      2. How can we live in a way where we are not enjoying humor about sin?
      3. Constable: The general lesson of the passage is that God blesses those who behave righteously but curses those who abandon moral restraint.